|
Senator Maurice Hayes, Chairman,
The Ireland Funds Advisory Committee writes about
'Swings and Roundabouts'
I remember an occasion, about twenty-five years ago,
watching two little girls play on a swing in a tranquil
seaside village in Co. Down, mercifully insulated
from the grosser aspects of the Northern Ireland conflict.
One of them had been intimidated out of her home in
Belfast in a period of sectarian strife and had come
to live with her grandparents-our neighbors. The other
little girl was my five year-old daughter.
As they played, I was intrigued to hear the little
Belfast girl say, "Lets play 'protestants', I
want to be the protestant." I asked her why she
wanted to be the protestant. Her reply was chilling.
"I want to push her off the swing."
In another context, it could just as easily have
been a little catholic girl who had been put off the
swing, but that bit of childish make-believe told
me more about the realities of life to a little child,
catholic or protestant, living in a sectarian interface,
in the shadow of an age-old adult struggle to which
they were being sucked in and indoctrinated.
That incident has been a benchmark against which
I have measured progress towards peace and reconciliation.
Things have gotten better, but not universally and
not always at the same rate. Indeed it is sometimes
the fact that there have been improvements at a political
level which lay bare the deep residual pools of sectarian
bitterness that will continue to poison the atmosphere
for some time ahead.
An example of this has been the recent sight of little
children being escorted to school in North Belfast
between ranks of riot police, to prevent them being
abused by the parents and children of a neighboring
community. Most people will find it sad that children
should be exposed in this way. Even sadder perhaps
is the sight of other children of the same age being
encouraged, even trained to join in the abuse that
is being hurled at those who in other circumstances
should be their friends and play fellows.
What all this underlines is the disappointing truth
that the improvement in the quality of the dialogue
at a political level has not followed on to the local
levels. The chiefs may be in pow-wow, with success,
but the Indians are still miles apart separated by
suspicion, lacking trust and ancestral attitudes.
We may well be on the brink of historic developments
with the beginnings of decommissioning and demilitarization
in parallel, the new beginning in policing, the entrenchment
of human rights and changes in the criminal justices
system. The Assembly may have a bumpy ride as the
parties slowly learn to trust each other and work
together for the common goal on social and economic
problems. There will be instances of difficulty and
back sliding, but movement in general will be in the
right direction.
At the community and individual level there is much
still to be done. Apart from a history of animosity
stretching back through the generations, the conflict
of the last thirty years has left its scars. Terrible
things have been done; there has been suffering on
all sides, innocent victims, and what is now euphemistically
called "collateral damage". It will take
years to bind up the wounds, a generation to heal
the psychological scars and to lay the ghost of sectarian
bitterness and bigotry.
The task of the present generation is to break the
cycle of bitterness, as we have hopefully broken the
cycle of violence and terror. To preserve our children
and grandchildren from the legacy of hate which we
have received from our grandparents. It is a difficult,
daunting and challenging task, but nonetheless worthwhile
because it is so necessary.
Related
Article >
Related
Article >
Related
Article >
Related
Article >
This article first appeared
in Connections Winter 2002 issue
|